On March 28, the Thai People’s and Student Reform Network held a rally in Bangkok to oppose the entertainment complex bill set for cabinet review, expressing concerns over the potential negative impacts of legalized gambling.
March 28, 2025, Bangkok, Thailand—Hundreds of protesters gathered at the Chamai Maruchet Bridge in Thailand’s capital, Bangkok, to express their dissatisfaction with the entertainment complex bill slated for cabinet review. The core of this bill includes the legalization of casinos, which has sparked strong opposition from the public, particularly from students and social activists. They argue that such a policy could have serious negative repercussions for society.
The protest began in the morning, with participants marching along major thoroughfares until they reached the Misakawan Intersection. To ensure the safety of the demonstration, police enforced traffic closures. While this decision aimed to maintain public order, it also resulted in traffic congestion in the surrounding areas. Protesters held up placards and shouted slogans, voicing their disappointment and discontent with government decision-making.
According to government plans, the entertainment complex bill would allow entrepreneurs to establish artificial destinations in Thailand that include casinos and at least four other commercial activities. Thai Finance Minister Pichai Chunhavanit stated at a press conference prior to the rally that the bill aims to stimulate the economy and tourism, attracting foreign investment into Thailand. He revealed that the Finance Ministry would also propose an urgent draft decree to amend the Securities Exchange Act to accommodate the new economic landscape.
However, many scholars and social activists have expressed concerns about the bill. They point out that the legalization of casinos could lead to gambling addiction, the emergence of gray markets, and an increase in corruption. Protesters at the rally issued warnings, emphasizing that the government should not solely focus on economic interests while neglecting the long-term health and stability of society. They believe that the introduction of casinos could negatively impact youth and increase the frequency of social problems.
Protesters also called for the government to conduct more extensive public consultations to ensure transparency and legitimacy in policy-making. They argue that any significant policy impacting the public interest should be decided based on thorough public opinion rather than being pushed unilaterally.
This protest not only represents a direct opposition to the entertainment complex bill but also serves as a reflection on current government policies. As society’s attention to gambling and its consequences grows, shifts in public opinion could have profound effects on government decision-making.
At the conclusion of the protest, participants pledged to continue monitoring government actions and to advocate for social change through legal means. They hope that through persistent efforts, the government will pay more attention to the overall interests of society in policy-making rather than focusing on short-term economic gains.
The news of the protest quickly spread, attracting widespread media and public attention. As the cabinet meeting approaches, the fate of the entertainment complex bill remains unclear, with various sectors of society closely watching the developments.
